|
The Future of Sleep Disorder Breathing Testing
Background
The prevalence of Sleep Disorder Breathing (SDB) has been well described
and documented. Awareness of the disorder, its negative impact on health,
and the financial burden it creates is growing globally. To address this
problem in the United States, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)
late last year approved non-sleep lab or home testing using only Type III
devices for patients suspected of having moderate to severe obstructive
sleep apnea.1 In March 2008, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) ignored the AASM recommendations and decided to reimburse
prescribed portable monitoring studies for Type II, Type III and Type IV
devices.2
Home Testing
These recent developments all point towards significant growth in the
ambulatory sleep diagnostic market.
One objective of home testing is self application of the device by the
patient. Therefore the devices must be simple to operate, small and have
fewer recording channels compared to full in-lab polysomnograms (PSGs).
As a result the devices have sacrificed some of the channels that would
otherwise be collected in a conventional sleep laboratory PSG because the
electrodes or monitoring devices are too difficult for self-application
by patients. The electrodes most commonly eliminated are those recording
the electroencephalogram (EEG) channels used currently to define sleep stages.
Although the portable devices collect some physiological measures during
sleep it accomplishes this without measuring if the patient is really asleep
by standard sleep staging criteria.
Nevertheless there are currently many portable devices (Embla markets
two: Embletta & Titanium) that collect this type of data and have grown
in popularity as the community moves away from traditional sleep labs towards
more ambulatory testing. Other factors driving this trend include but are
not limited to the high costs of in-lab testing, long waiting lists for
a PSG and the high prevalence of SDB in the general population.
Some limitations of home testing with ambulatory devices are that they
often require manual interpretation. Although less costly than in-lab procedures,
several devices can have a relatively high “cost per use” if used with nasal
cannulas, oximetry probes and respiratory effort belts. The combination
can be technically complicated to apply for some patients which sometimes
results in tests having to be repeated due to improper patient application.
Standard Sleep Measures
The current in-lab measure for SDB is the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI).
It is the number of apneas or hypopneas per hour during sleep. The concept
of AHI is based on the qualitative and quantitative identification of breathing
events during sleep, using changes in the EEG sleep to measure its disturbance
on sleep parameters. The arbitrary rules were developed several decades
ago, are very subjective and can have high interrater variability depending
on certain factors (i.e. age, pharmacotherapy). There has been no successful
proposal to replace the rules. Ambulatory devices generate an approximation
of the AHI using a respiration disturbance index (RDI) which is based on
the recording time. The RDI may underestimate the number of respiratory
events since it inherently does not measure sleep time and includes wake
time during the recording period.
New Technology
Over the last ten years researchers at Beth Israel Hospital in Boston,
have been studying how heart and pulmonary activity behaves during sleep.
Their findings demonstrate that the ECG can be used as a surrogate for categorizing
the sleep state. The technique combines heart rate variability and an ECG-derived
respiration signal from the R-wave amplitude fluctuations induced by respiration
to generate two data sets. Following artifact extraction and data re-sampling,
the cross-power and coherence between both cardiac and respiratory signals
are quantified to yield the ratio of coherent cross power in the low-frequency
(0.0–0.1 Hz) band to that in the high-frequency (0.1–0.4 Hz) band.3
A high proportion of power in the low frequency coupling (LFC) band is associated
with unstable or periodic sleep behaviors, while a high proportion of power
in the high frequency coupling (HFC) band is associated with physiologic
respiratory sinus arrhythmia and stable sleep and respiration.4
A third frequency identified as very low-frequency band (0.0–0.01) correlates
with periods of wake or REM sleep. The resultant spectrogram provides a
moving average of the dominant oscillatory ECG frequencies of autonomic
drive coupled with respiration in sleep. (See Figure 1).
Elevated low-frequency coupling (e-LFC) is a subset of LFC that correlates
with scored apneas and hypopneas in patients with sleep apnea. Elevated-LFC
shows a narrow spectral band in sleep apnea that seems to have a dominant
chemo-reflex influence – central sleep apnea (CSA), periodic breathing,
or complex sleep apnea syndrome (SAS); a broad spectral band is seen in
dominant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).4 (See Figure 2) It is the construct
of e-LFC in the spectrogram that allows the sleep technician or clinician
to easily differentiate between obstructive and non-obstructive sleep-disordered
breathing.
CPC technology represents a breakthrough
in how sleep can be visualized, by presenting a simple and accurate picture
of sleep oscillations and interactions instead of the tedious manual sleep
stage scoring and counting of respiratory events that has been the standard
for the last 40 years. The analysis has been validated using over 10,000
sleep studies at Beth Israel Hospital using its own data and that obtained
from the Sleep
Fig. 1. RemLogic CPC analysis spectrograph
demonstrating LFC and HFC oscillations in sleep from 9:00 PM to 12:30 PM;
a preponderance of LFC or unstable sleep from 12:30 PM to 5:00 PM with a
representative segment of the nocturnal PSG in the background (time ~ 2:50
AM) during LFC showing repetitive OSAH.

Fig. 2. RemLogic CPC analysis spectrograph
demonstrating elevated-LFC (e-LFC) broad spectral band in sleep from 10:00
to 11:00 PM and 02:30 to 05:00 AM; showing a preponderance of e-LFC broad
spectral band that is dominant in obstructive sleep apnea. The representative
segment of the nocturnal PSG is shown in the background (time ~ 2:47 AM)
showing repetitive OSAH.
Heart Health Study.5 “The CPC technology is not a sleep-stage
or respiratory event detector but [it] does provide a dynamic measure of
sleep state-modulated cardio-pulmonary interactions,” says Dr. Robert Thomas.
“As the technique is automated, inter-scorer reliability is eliminated as
a problem. The technique can track dynamic sleep physiology, and provide
a unique ambulatory measure of sleep quality.”
ACPC analytical tool is currently being developed by Embla Inc. (Broomfield,
CO, USA) and is expected to be available for sleep labs, clinicians and
technicians in Q4 of 2008. The CPC analytical software will be demonstrated
during the Sleep 2008 convention in Baltimore, MA at the Embla booth. In
addition, a new CPC device that records ECG, nocturnal activity, and sleep
position will be unveiled at the trade show with demonstrations of its connectivity
to and functionality on the Internet. CPC technology will provide a fundamentally
new method to aid in SDB differentiation, identification, treatment and
assessment of compliance of SDB patients on therapy.
David Baker
President and CEO of Embla Systems
Denver, Colorado
Preetam Schramm, PhD, RPSGT
Senior Clinical Consultant for Embla Systems
Freiburg, Germany
References
1. Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, et al. Portable Monitoring Task
Force on the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Clinical Guidelines for
the Use of Portable Monitoring Devices in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep
Apnea in Adults Patients. J Clin Sleep Med, 2007; 3(7):1–16.
2. Decision Memo for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) (CAG-00093R2) https://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionsmemo.asp?from
2=viewdecisionmemo.asp&id=204&.
3. Thomas RJ, Mietus JE, Peng CK, Goldberger AL. An electrocardiogram-
based technique to assess cardiopulmonary coupling during sleep. Sleep 2005;
28:1151–61.
4. Thomas R, Mietus J, Peng CK, Gilmartin G, Daly RW, Golberger A, Gottleib
DJ. Differentiating obstructive from central and complex sleep apnea using
an automated electrocardiogram-based method. Sleep 2007; Dec 1, 30(12):1756–69.
5. Quan SF, Howard BV, Iber C, et al. The Sleep Heart Health Study: design,
rationale, and methods. Sleep 1997; 20(12): 1077–1085.
Journal
List
|