|
Advancing the Science of Sleep
Medicine
Eric W. Sivertson
President and CEO
Dymedix Corporation
Shoreview, MN
THE MOST ADVANCED SENSOR - PVDF
We have the intellectual capacity that our founder, Peter Stasz,
a brilliant electrical engineer and experienced inventor, brings
to Dymedix. It was his ability to couple signal processing
technology with the piezo film to create the most advanced
sensor. Piezo film technology is used in many sophisticated
applications including Navy sonar arrays, dual chamber rate
responsive pacemakers, seismic accelerometers and it is the
sensor in the Welch Allyn stethoscope.
Piezo film generates its own electrical energy. A very
small amount of electrical energy is enough to make this
film ideal for measuring temperature variance and pressure
variance because it has both piezo and pyro electric
properties. In addition, the signal processing capabilities
of polyvinylidene fluoride film or PVDF allows us to be
compatible with every single PSG in the market. Others
have tried, but they could not come up with the filtration
to get that particular sense of physiological change
whether it is movement, pressure or temperature. The
whole patent portfolio of Dymedix is based on our PVDF
sensor and the signal processing required to display the
appropriate clinical waveform. This allowed us to enter
the market with the most advanced sensor technology
available to sleep labs. Our competitors have tried to get
PVDF film to work but have been unable to do so.
UNIQUE, INNOVATIVE AND DIFFERENT SENSING
TECHNOLOGY
We have a very unique and different sensing technology. It
measures thermal, pressure, noise and movement and does
it quicker than anything else because it is linear and works in
realtimeso we can get an accurate fast signal to the PSG where
others have a timing delay. The response time of PVDF film
is an incredibly fast five thousandths of a second. Dymedix
has nine issued patents for our technology as it relates to
the sleep industry along with another seven new patents
pending. Behind these, we have another ten concepts in
development. The technology is unique and innovative. We
do not produce "me too" products. Ours are an improvement
on what is currently available, and the corporate
vision of Dymedix is to help "advance the science of sleep".
If we cannot come up with a better technology, we do not
develop it. We have constructed a broad patent portfolio
that surrounds our technology, which we intend to protect
at all costs. TWO NEW PREMIERE PRODUCTS IN OUR PORTFOLIO
In our core business we have all of the data capture devices
that are used during clinical sleep studies. We also now have
the capabilities to provide custom disposable patient kits
for Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 home testing. We design our products
to be 100% in compliance with, or surpass the current
AASM standards.
Two of our premiere products that are getting great traction
in the marketplace are the Apollo™ dual airflow sensor and
our Perfect Fit™ respiratory effort belt.
The Apollo product has two individual sensors to measure
pressure and temperature signals. What it does best
is plot two very key physiological functions, and it does
it without a cannula. Most people who are around sleep
labs understand how burdensome a cannula is to fit on the
patient, keeping it in place, and basically all the issues that
go along with patient comfort. The objective is to have the
patient lie down, be comfortable and get a good night's
sleep so it can be measured. Unfortunately inserting a sensor
up a person's nose is quite uncomfortable, especially
for pediatrics, and can very easily dislodge with any kind
of movement. There is a preference and an opening in the
market for an alternative to cannulas.
Perfect Fit respiratory effort belts provide an alternative to
RIP that is more economical and solves problems associated
with piezo ceramic belts. Perfect Fit also provides greater
patient comfort at a tremendous cost savings, better reliability
and greater ease of use for sleep disorder center staff.
DETERMINING UNMET MARKET NEEDS
These two new products were a result of Dymedix conducted
market research to identify and define significant unmet needs
within sleep medicine. Both sleep doctors and lab technicians
were surveyed to identify areas that Dymedix could add value
to clinical outcomes and greater efficiencies during a sleep
study. Three opportunities became apparent from the outcomes
of this research.
- Expand the pediatric line of sensors.
- A respiratory effort belt that is durable, accurate and
comfortable.
- Get the cannula out of the nose.
We have introduced advanced solutions for all three unmet
needs. Our pediatric line was expanded in the summer
of 2007. We launched our new respiratory effort belt at the
end of 2007 and added a SUM channel in Q2, 2008. We then
introduced our cannula free Apollo™ airflow sensor in
September of 2008, which combines both pressure and thermal
signals to detect hypopneas and apneas. Our market research
has identified additional unmet market needs and we are
actively developing more advanced solutions.
SUPPORTING THE SAFETY, EFFICACY AND BENEFIT
OF OUR PRODUCTS WITH CLINICAL SCIENCE
All Dymedix products have FDA 510K clearance that satisfies
all safety and efficacy issues. We have over 25 clinical
publications and white papers from Board Certified Sleep
Medicine Physicians, RPSGT's and our R&D group. A clinical
study published in CHEST (Berry et al, 2005)1 concluded that
our HDAR (PVDF) sensor compared favorably with pneumotach.
Another study published in Sleep Diagnosis and
Therapy (Orr et al, 2006)2 shows a favorable clinical comparison
of PVDF to esophageal balloons.
We have two clinical trials ongoing at Case Western
Reserve University School of Medicine. The first study
compares our Perfect Fit respiratory effort belt with respiratory
inductive plethsomography (RIP) that is currently
recommended by the AASM. The second is based on a
3-year study of 1,200 patients, which compared our PVDF
airflow sensor to air pressure transducer technology. 150
patients from this cohort will be double blind scored with
an equal distribution of mild, moderate and severe OSA.
The outcomes from this study will prove once and for all,
the similarities and/or differences between our PVDF film
technology and nasal prong pressure.
Two other studies that are in progress are being directed
by Dr. Richard Berry, University of Florida Health Science
Center based in Gainesville Florida who is working on a comprehensive
study on our Apollo airflow sensor and a second
study on our respiratory effort belts.
THE PERFECT-FIT EFFORT BELT - UNLIKE ANY
IN THE MARKET
Our Perfect Fit belts were developed in response to an unmet
market need. Our market research in 2006 told us that
customers were not at all happy with any belt on the market.
We developed customer required specifications and worked
with United Sleep Medicine and Johns Hopkins to design and
test these new belts. The Perfect Fit belts were introduced in
the fourth quarter of 2007 and a SUM channel was added
in the second quarter, 2008. Ironically, one of the roadblocks
has come from the new standards published by the American
Academy of Sleep Medicine "AASM".
The AASM published new standards for the scoring of
sleep and associated events in early 2008. These standards
address rules, terminology and technical specifications to help
establish a more comprehensive system of standardized
metrics. We support their efforts and their commitment to
advance the science. Unknowingly and unintentionally
however, they have created a barrier for innovative companies
like Dymedix who bring new technologies to the market
to improve clinical outcomes. As an example, there are two
recommendations within this new scoring manual that have
created challenges to our ability to market our products. First
is the specific reference to respiratory inductance plethysmography
as the recommended method for measuring respiratory
effort. The second is section 3.4 published in the Journal of
Clinical Sleep Medicine (Redline et al, 2007)3. Both of these have
restrained our ability to conduct trade.
OVERCOMING CHALLENGES
Our effort belt technology utilizes the capacitance element
of impedance not the inductance element of impedance that
is specified by the AASM standards. Impedance consists of
three electrical principles: resistance, capacitance and inductance.
Our impedance technology however, is not the same
as what was referenced in many of the published literature
that refers to respiratory impedance plethysmography. The
impedance technology in these publications utilize two
electrodes that pass a current through the body to measure
breathing as referenced in Sleep Diagnosis and Therapy
(Cardozo 2007)4. Our effort belt technology is unlike any in
the market. PVDF film generates pencil sharp waveforms for
better effort measurements. Unfortunately, certain elements
in the market are making it difficult for customers to experience
the quality signal, durability, patient comfort and economic
advantages of our new technology for fear of implications to
their accreditation status.
The second involves a gross misperception about our
piezo film technology and has been greatly accentuated
by section 3.4 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (Redline
et al, 2007)3. This section specifically states that all piezo
electric and strain gauge sensors are not recommended for
measuring respiratory effort. We believe this section was
intended to refer to piezo crystal and ceramic sensors that
have not had a good track record in accurately measuring
effort. By casting such a broad scope on piezo electric
technology certain elements in the market have mistakenly
attached piezo film to this category when we are not even
similar to the crystal and ceramic technologies. This is like
inferring that apple pies are the same as pizza pies. Certain
market elements are also claiming that our belt sensor
technology is a strain gauge, which is completely untrue.
More specific definitions of piezo electric and strain gauge
technologies by the AASM would clarify these misperceptions
in the market.
We are encouraging the AASM to come up with a way to
allow new technology, from all companies, to be evaluated
fairly and accurately until the evidence based, peer reviewed
process can be completed. We have also suggested that an
engineering expertise be coupled with the Rand/UCLA
"Consensus" process described in the standards manual.
This could have eliminated the misperceptions about the
differences in piezo electric and strain gauge technologies.
The current standards make it challenging for innovative
companies with new technology to conduct business in sleep
medicine and they could impact R&D investment decisions.
The current position of, "meets or doesn't meet standards"
effectively restrains new technology from being marketed
for 12-14 months in order to comply with these new standards.
I am not aware of any other medical specialty that restrains
new technology like this.
UNDERSTANDING AND BEING UNDERSTOOD
BY THE MARKET
By far, our biggest challenge has been getting the industry
to understand that PVDF is not a traditional thermal or
pressure sensor. Our piezo film technology is completely
different than thermistor and thermocouple sensors. We
know that our technology can deliver the same results as
the nasal prong pressure sensors with the added benefits
of nasal and oral airflow detection in the same sensor,
without cannula.
Our customers really like our products. However, the
Dymedix technology has been a blessing as well as a curse.
As a result, we have been typecast with piezo crystal and
piezo ceramic, although our technology is based on different electrical principles. We are also different from
traditional piezo crystal and piezo ceramic sensors that
are used in the non square root versions of air pressure
transducers and our film is not a strain gauge. We have
had to address some misconceptions in the market but we
are close to clarifying these misconceptions with evidence
based, peer reviewed data.
HOW OUR PRODUCTS AFFECT PATIENT CARE
There are several ways that our products directly affect
patient care. Apart from our reusable sensors that utilize
PVDF technology, we are the only company that has a full line
of completely disposable sensors. Infection control and Joint
Commission inspections are important in hospital-owned and
affiliated segments and we are seeing an accelerated rate of
conversion from reusable to disposable in these settings.
Within our disposable line we have developed disposable
custom patient kits for home testing. Another benefit to the
patient is we do not have a cannula on our airflow sensors,
which is especially beneficial for our broad line of pediatric
products which are all disposable. We also offer our effort
belts in both reusable and disposable models along with a
disposable pediatric version, which nobody else offers.
The signal from our sensors is filtered through our Electronic
Filtration Module™ (EFM™) to produce the most clinically
appropriate waveform so the patient is accurately diagnosed
to receive the proper therapy prescription. Sleep medicine
reimbursements vary from state to state and payer to payer.
Our sensors will produce the appropriate clinical waveforms
to ensure reimbursement without jeopardizing accurate diagnosis.
The independent labs and regional-national sleep lab
chains need economical and durable supplies to meet their
operating objectives while still providing high-quality outcomes.
We believe we offer the best technology for this
segment of the market.
Lastly, all of our sensors offer convenience and ease of
use to the lab technicians. Cleaning and sanitizing our reusable
sensors are much easier and faster than the traditional
thermal and pressure products. Our disposable line offers
the ultimate combination of accuracy for better outcomes
and convenience to make life easier in sleep labs.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND LISTENING
TO OUR CUSTOMERS
We do not develop new products or modify existing products
without customer and patient involvement. Dymedix has a
technical advisory board, which was formed two years ago,
and meets several times a year to test new ideas and concepts
with people who use our products every day. As an example,
our Perfect Fit respiratory effort belt was co-developed and
market tested at John Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD.
All new and current technology is driven by customer-defined
specifications.
PRODUCTS THAT EQUIP SLEEP LABS TO COMPETE
The comfort of our sensors with no cannula, the quality of
our effort belts and the upcoming launch of our wireless technology to the market, we believe, will all have a significant
impact on a labs ability to compete for referring physician's
patients. Also, as the home testing market develops
we believe we are well positioned with our custom disposable
patient kits and a new wireless, web based diagnostic
technology from Europe that will allow for real time remote
monitoring from sleep centers.
THE FUTURE FOR DYMEDIX AND SLEEP MEDICINE
Our mission statement is to develop and market technology
that helps advance the science of sleep medicine. This is
one of our strategic filters, which every new idea must pass.
Everything Dymedix has developed in the past three years
or products that we are currently in the process of developing
must pass these strategic filters or we will not move
forward with it.
We also view 2008 as a landmark year for sleep medicine.
There are a several significant reasons for this:
- New AASM scoring standards.
- CMS recommendation to approve Home Sleep Testing
for reimbursement.
- Published literature about sleep disorders has quadrupled
in the past 10 years.
- The acute co-morbidities that are now directly related to
sleep apnea.
In response to and in an effort to address the co-morbidities
associated with sleep disorders, Dymedix entered into a
5-year Master Research Agreement with the Mayo Clinic in
Rochester, MN. This global clinical partnership with Mayo
will focus on co-developing new technologies to address
these acute co-morbidities relating to sleep disorders. Mayo
is a unique example of cross medical specialties collaborating.
This is a great opportunity for Dymedix to work with the
different sub specialties to address the co-morbidities linked
to sleep disorders with the end point of helping to advance
the science of sleep medicine. Along with companies such as
G.E., Siemens and Philips Healthcare, Dymedix is part of a
prestigious group of companies that has this Master Research
Agreement with the Mayo.
REFERENCES
1.
Richard B. Berry, Gary L. Koch, Steven Trautz and Mary H. Wagner
"Comparison of Respiratory Event Detection by a Polyvinylidene
Fluoride Film Airflow Sensor and a Pneumotachograph in Sleep
Apnea Patients" Chest Journal September 2005 128:1331-1338.
2.
Susanne Goodrich, Maroun Tawk and William C. Orr "The Use of
Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Film Airflow Sensors: An Alternative
to the Nasal Cannula for Measuring Respiratory Events"
Sleep Diagnosis and Therapy 2006 V1 N5 30-31.
3.
Susan Redline, M.D., M.P.H.; Rohit Budhiraja, M.D.; Vishesh
Kapur, M.D., M.P.H; Carole L. Marcus, M.B., B.Ch; Jason H.
Mateika, Ph.D; Reena Mehra, M.D., M.S; Sariam Parthasarthy.
M.D; Virend K. Somers, M.D; Kingman P. Strohl, M.D, Loreto G.
Sulit, M.D; David Gozal, M.D; Merrill S. Wise, M.D; and Stuart
F. Quan, M.D, "The Scoring of Respiratory Events in Sleep:
Reliability and Validity" Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2007
Vol. 3, No. 2, 169-200.
4.
J. Scott Cardozo "New AASM Recommendations for Sensors:
A Simple Guide for the Sleep Technologist" Sleep Diagnosis and
Therapy 2008 V3 N5 21-22.
Journal
List
|